|
|
|
 |
1. Student Name
|
| | FAWAZ B. AL-SAHALI |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
| | Tarq Sultan Ali Al-Sultan |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
| | Sultan ali hadi |
| | | 1 (33%) | |
|
|
Total: 3 |
2. Student ID
|
| | 426107909 |
| | | 1 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 426101934 |
| | | 1 (50%) | |
|
|
Total: 2 |
3. Course ID and Title
|
| | GE 209: FORTRAN Programming |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | ChE 401 : Computational methods for chemical Engineers |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | CHE401 |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 401 Che |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
4. The instructor is well prepared for class sessions.
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 3 (75%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
5. The instructor answers questions carefully and completely
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 3 (75%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
6. The instructor uses examples to make the materials easy to understand
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
7. The instructor stimulated interest in the course.
|
| | 5 excellent |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
8. The instructor made the course material interesting
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 3 (75%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
9. The instructor is knowledgeable about the topics presented in the course
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 3 (75%) | |
|
|
| | 4 good |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
10. The instructor treats students respectfully
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Notaceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
11. The instructor is fair in dealing with students.
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 3 (75%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
12. The instructor makes students feel comfortable about asking questions.
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 3 (75%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
13. Course assignments are interesting and stimulating
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
14. The instructor's use of technology enhanced learning in the classroom.
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
15. Directions for course assignments were clear
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 3 (75%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
16. The difficulty level of this course evaluation survey was appropriate for me
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 3 (75%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
17. The Instructor makes his best effort to explain the subject
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
18. The Instructor is punctual and organized
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
19. Is number of lecture classes adequate
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
20. Is time devoted for Computer tutorial adequate
|
| | 5 Excellent |
| | | 2 (50%) | |
|
|
| | 4 Good |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
| | 3 Satisfactory |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 2 Weak |
| | | 1 (25%) | |
|
|
| | 1 Not acceptable |
| | | 0 (0%) | |
|
|
Total: 4 |
21. Tell us what do you like and dislike about the course
|
| | Suggested that the lecture of Computer tutorial will be longer than the current |
| | | 1 (100%) | |
|
|
Total: 1 |
22. As a teacher, what can I do to keep you motivated during class?
|
| | The development of questions for discussion and allocation of additional degrees for this questions. |
| | | 1 (100%) | |
|
|
Total: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| King Saud University. All rights reserved,
2007 | Disclaimer
| CiteSeerx
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|